More on British Jews.

.
.
.
.
Clearly they have entrenched themselves within British society.............many/most of them can pass as English without a second thought.......they have English names...........and some of them have adopted the Christian religion, at least overtly to increase their progress in British society, BUT alas there is that peculiar tribal pull, which for all their "integration" marks them out as Jews, rooting for their tribe and country, Israel.

In that sense the latest Iraq inquiry will be a complete waste of time, and money.........it is pure Jewish vaudeville to appease general British public sentiment against wars for Israel in Iraq.

Sir Humphrey (real life Jew) to PM Jim Hacker in "Yes Prime Minister", something along the lines of........"PM, Public inquiries are held not to discover the truth, but to bury them"

So nothing will happen after the Iraq inquiry, and the equally, if not more important parallel issue of why the UK is turning itself into a mad police state, that is unrivaled in the world, using the pretext of unnecessary Jew instituted wars and false terrorist incidents, chasing non-existent enemies.....killing and harming innocents...............that's the fundamental issue....for the United Kingdom.

To be sure the Jew in the UK may feel a need to tighten their control of the country, even further.......but to what end? To institute policies which are unpalatable.....what is the full range of Jew agenda policies over the UK?.......Climate Change Control, so obediently espoused by the leadership of the country....do you need complete control of a country like a total police state to institute such a policy?................Race riots?..........more wars for Israel?........The reinstating of the British empire?

Since the government cannot be trusted to give the real reasons, but only lies and disinformation, we must read the tea leaves and find out why.

_____________________________________

MANNING, IRAQ, 9 11, JEWS

By Aangirfan

Sir David Manning, who was Tony Blair's foreign policy adviser, may be one of those people who knows who really carried out the 9 11 attacks.

Manning, a Jew, was in Washington meeting Richard Armitage around the time of 9 11. (US State Department, September 10, 2001).

Manning told the official UK inquiry into the Iraq war that Bush, speaking to Blair by phone on 14 September 2001, "said that he thought there might be evidence that there was some connection between Saddam Hussein and Osama bin Laden and al-Qaida." (Chilcot inquiry hears Bush began Iraq war drumbeat three days after 9/11)

Manning should have known that Saddam had been trained and put into power by the CIA and that Osama worked for the CIA at least until 9 11. (Exclusive: Saddam Was key in early CIA plot / Against All Enemies: Bombshell: Bin Laden worked for US till 9/11)

(Yes it is coming out from various experts in the USA that American intelligence had by 2003 bought the entire top brass of the Iraqi military, including Saddam's head of intelligence.......so besides the issue of whether Saddam was initially installed by the USA in the 1960's....agents can turn rogue.....the CLEAR fact was that America defacto through the high echelon links of the Iraqi military basically controlled Iraq...and Saddam's Iraq by 2003.....and they clearly knew, THROUGH THESE HIGH LEVEL CONTACTS, he didn't have WMD's, and posed no threat to anybody...he had by 2003 been effectively newtured.

Saddam by 2003 was looking for a guaranteed safe haven in the Emirates, which the Americans for some reason or another wouldn't give him.................as to Fake al-Qaeda.....more information is coming out that up into the summer of 2001, Osama Bin Laden was in contact with his Western intelligence handlers.......Sibel Edmonds etc.....these are some of the real allied issues WHICH CLARIFY MATTERS OVER THE BIG PICTURE...................BUT with the Iraq Public inquiry look for sly Jew misdirections into meaningless trivia, unimportant minutiae issue of who what when, how...............to the the point it becomes for the public too complicated, and boring)


Two Jews in an intimate moment??

Who are the people who secretly run the governments of so-called democracies such as the USA and UK?

One of these people is Sir David Manning.

1. Sir David Manning was in Washington in September 2001 (US State Department, September 10, 2001).

Some conspiracy theorists might speculate that Manning was one of the planners of 9 11.

Manning was UK ambassador to Israel between 1995 and 1998, foreign policy adviser to Blair from 2001 to 2003 and UK ambassador to the USA from 2003 to 2007.

2. Manning helped plan the Iraq War, and memos have revealed how he knew Blair had promised to go to war with Bush a year before the conflict. (Tony Blair's Iraq adviser Mail Online)

3. Manning is one of the people who wanted the Bank of Scotland to be taken over by an English bank.

Sir David Manning is on the board of Lloyds TSB.

4. On 16 November 2008, we learnt that Manning, won a £50000 U.S. defence job (Mail Online)

Manning has been given a senior post with U.S.-owned arms company Lockheed.

Lockheed earns large sums from the Ministry of Defence.

5. Manning has joined a shadowy UK intelligence firm set up by former spies.

Manning is on the advisory board of Hakluyt, a private intelligence firm partly staffed by former MI6 officers. (Hakluyt set up by former MI6 agents spied on campaign groups for ...)

Hakluyt was set up by former MI6 agents in 1995.

The firm once spied on environmental campaign groups such as Greenpeace on behalf of oil companies.

~~~

The UK's Iraq Inquiry seems to involve a lot of Jewish folks.

So far we have heard evidence from Sir Christopher Meyer, Sir Jeremy Greenstock and Sir David Manning.

Two of the five members of the inquiry panel are Jews - Sir Martin Gilbert and Sir Lawrence Freedman.

The boss of BP at the time of 9 11 was John Browne, who has Jewish origins.

Blair's Attorney General was Peter Goldsmith, a Jew.

Former Labour MP Tam Dalyell complained of a "cabal of Jewish advisers" unduly influencing Tony Blair:

Lord Levy, Tony Blair's Middle East envoy,

Sir Martin Gilbert speaking at a conference and organization called "Justice for Jews from Arab countries " in 2008, last year......the Chutzpah of such a name after Gaza 2009! Lebanon 2006! Iraq 2003--now, and forever!!! Sabra and Shatila massacres of 1982!!!!!

From Wikipedia:

Professor Freedman held positions at the International Institute for Strategic StudiesRoyal Institute of International Affairs (Chatham House) before he was appointed, in 1982, Professor of War Studies at King's College London. He has been Vice Principal (Research) of King's Fellow since 1992.......does such a background make him a "insider establishment figure" who is sympathetic to the establishment Jewish agenda?....Is he seriously going to get at the truth of cooking false facts by powerful Jews at the corridors of power, to commit Britain to war FOR ISRAEL..................nah.

Peter Mandelson, whose father is Jewish,

and Blair's Foreign Secretary Jack Straw, who has Jewish ancestry.

Tony Blair reportedly has Jewish origins, through his mother's mother.

Tony Blair is the son of Leo and Hazel Blair (née Corscadden).

Leo Blair (born Charles Leonard Augustus Parsons) was the illegitimate[11] son of two English actors: Charles Parsons and Mary Augusta Ridgway (née Bridson)

Hazel Blair (nee Corscadden) was the daughter of George Corscadden and Sarah Margaret (née Lipsett).

The Lipsett family reportedly originated with a German Jewish immigrant to Ireland.

The Queen may have Jewish links. Queen Victoria's husband Prince Albert may have been Jewish. (aangirfan: British Royal Family's Irish and Jewish Links)

____________________________________________

http://mostaqueali.blogspot.com/2008/06/gossip-is-next-heir-to-throne-after.html

Jews in Britain.

.
.
.
.
...Talking of corruption, the corruption of the British political system by Israel is investigated by British television.

The Jewish writer below takes a radicalized narrative approach to this extremely important problem, and tells it like it really is. Like me he discards polite words to describe what is an extremely serious situations. It is unpretentious. I do not come across this form of writing too often, so I have posted his article.

The problem for Britain ultimately relates to matters of national security, declarations of war, troop engagements, terrorism.........and much much more, and how they are conducted in the UK, so this topic is very important, very fundamental as to what type of British society will evolve into in the near future....more so if Britain were to become a total police state, because it serves Israel's underlying overall interests, based on actions of Israel within Britain covert or otherwise, with their British gentile underling lieutenants.

The Iraqi invasion of 2003 was done at Israel's behest; 9/11 was carried by Israel and their American lieutenants; "al-Qaeda" does not exist; 7/7 and all the terrorist acts since 2005 were carried out by Israel's lieutenants in British security.

His flaw is that he thinks Israel and its lobbying is the only and main problem.

He does not suggest extensively how the problem will be dealt with seriously beyond mere rhetoric.

How do you de-invent Zionism? Is Zionism the only problem? How do you deal with an ideology without dealing with the base of its people? How do you clearly with certainty separate the two? Does not the Jew prize secrecy, and surreptitious plotting?

As with America, the problem is not Israel ONLY. The problem lies with the Jews who live in those countries who actively work for Israel. In America's case the 8/9 million Jews, and more dangerously, because you do not know they are Jews, so you cannot connect the government policies to their tribal links, crypto-Jews who live in that great country, organized around 52 Jewish lobby groups, feverishly, without question lobbying for Israel.

Through their total control of the American media; American finance....ALL Federal Reserve Presidents must be Jews, ALL Federal Reserve board members must be Jews {Democracy??? Fair play representation??? "Fuck you goy, you ain't touching our fiat money printing machine"}; and the slow infiltration of American security.............and finally American politics, providing Presidents like Teddy Roosvelt, FD Roosevelt, Harry Soloman Truman, Dwight Eisenhower, Lyndon Baines Johnson, ALL crypto -Jews.....


In Britain officially there are 350,000 Jews. Unofficially the true figure is more likely to be nearer 1,000,000 . Because of Jewish social and business requirements, and the need to overcome identity and ethnic bias issues, more often than not they cover their real identity even in this modern day and age, and don't readily divulge it, beyond their intimate circle, except where they are present in significant numbers, and feel confident to unmask themselves....in Israel, NY......or they are ultra-religiously inclined like Hassidic Jews etc.

They were expelled from England around 1300, allegedly because they were carrying out blood sacrfices on gentile children, and their usury practices had become unbearable. They use the blood of the sacrificed children to make special religious bread, which they subsequently eat at special religious ocassions.

The Jewish religion is a despicable North African Bongo Bongo religion, but unfortunately, unlike the teachings of Christ, Mohammed, Buddha........translated into ALL languages with very easy access, so that everybody can access the good wholesome message of good thoughts, good words and good deeds.........I challenge anybody to find authentic translated copies of the Torah/Talmud in English. For good reason you will not find copies readily available, because with Judaism we are talking about a truly evil religion, a dangerous religion, a profoundly anti-human religion.

After the English Civil war they are were unofficially allowed back into England by Oliver Cromwell. The Jews in Holland had funded his war machine. The Jew likes war........because it means goy blood sacrifice, and war can be very profitable. From their base in London they gradually expanded their influence in the country, eventually establishing the Bank of England (1694), and the funding of the East India Company (1708).

Continuous war by Britain in the 18th century, Jew funded empire, Master of the Opium trade...........then the mother of all evil Jews the Rothschild enter Britain from Germany in 1798.........Napoleonic wars........Rothschild dominate 19th century......protocols.....Jews in Britain, France, USA, Germany institute WW I....WWII......(work in progress)

So I would say the problem is not merely Zionism, or even Israel..........we do not need to be strategic experts to identify the evil nature of Israel. But the main problem is Jews who reside in Gentile countries which are powerful and significant in the world , like the USA, UK etc which have consequencies for the world, subequently.

_____________________________________ _

Britain must de-Zionise Itself Immediately

By Gilad Atzmon

November 17, 2009 "Information Clearing House" -- On Monday the British TV broadcaster, Channel 4 screened Inside Britain’s Israel Lobby, a devastating expose of the Jewish lobby in the UK*. ‘We couldn’t find a conspiracy’ affirmed Peter Oborne the Daily Mail’s political commentator behind the film. He was right. After running the show for so many years, the Jewish lobby’s purchasing of British politicians and media presence is in the open.

The Guardian reported today that two years ago a controversial study by American academics Stephen Walt and John Mearsheimer explored the influence of the Israel lobby over US foreign policy “but Britain's pro-Israel organisations have been subjected to far too less scrutiny.” This is indeed the case, and as Oborne disclosed, both British politicians and Zionist pressure groups enjoy it to the max.

In the film Sir Richard Dalton, a former ambassador to Libya and Iran, said: "I don't believe, and I don't think anybody else believes these contributions come with no strings attached." I would suggest that ‘strings attached’ is a very gentle way of putting it. ‘Chained to submission’ would be far closer to the truth.

Seemingly a British, consensus case against Zionism and Zionist infiltration is piling up.

The Jewish community is not happy at all. After so many years of setting the tone, bribing UK politicians and controlling the BBC they are used to being untouchable.

Labor MP Denis MacShane, who operates as the House of Common’s UK equivalent of the ‘anti defamation league’ told the Jerusalem Post "if there is a Jewish /Israel lobby here, it is not very effective, as Israel is almost treated as a pariah state in the media and has few friends in politics."

MacShane may be right; one cannot buy friendship with money. But according to Monday’s broadcast one can certainly buy British politician’s subservience for just a few shekels. According to the Guardian 50% of the Shadow Cabinet are now ‘friends of Israel’. In that context one common saying comes to mind. “Tell me who your friends are and I will tell you who you are”

I would assume that if there was any public respect left for the British Parliament, British political parties and the BBC, it should be gone by now. Just a few months ago Brits were devastated to find out about their MPs' personal expenses bills. Yesterday they learned about their leading politician’s affiliation with the darkest possible regime and ideology around. They also learned that their national broadcast corporation is influenced by Zionists pressure groups run from Jerusalem.

Mark Gardner from the Zionist ‘Community Security Trust’ is not happy either. He complained that Dispatches producers behaved as if they were investigating a “criminal gang rather than various Jewish community-linked organizations,"

Gardner is also correct. It is indeed tragic to admit that the Jewish lobby is far more worrying than a criminal gang. It is there to serve a murderous state with a devastating record of crimes against humanity. Thanks to the Jewish lobby, we are all complicit in the Zionist crime. Not only are those lobbyists heavily corrupted and removed from any ethical value system, they also corrupt everything they touch. They obviously contaminate every politician who is happy to take their shekels. Consequently they incriminate us all as a society.

Watching Cannel 4’s Dispatches yesterday I wondered to myself whether this is the ‘democracy’ some British politicians, such as David Miliband insist on spreading around. I also wonder whether this is the governing model that Jewish Chronicle writer Nick Cohen and the Israeli Hasbara committee author David Aaronovitch were trying to promote when they were supporting the invasion of Iraq back in 2003.

Political commentator Peter Oborne indeed fulfilled his promise. He told us almost everything we want to know about the lobby, “who they are, how they are funded, how they work and what influence they have, from the key groups to the wealthy individuals who help bankroll the lobbying.”

However, there is a single observation that must be added. People out there must never forget that Britain was taken into a war that cost more than a million Iraqi lives and at the time Lord Levy was the Number 1 Labour fund-raiser. Putting the two together: an illegal war that only serves Israeli interests and Sir Richard Dalton’s observation that Zionist ‘contribution’ comes with ‘strings attached’, leaves a very bitter taste. Due to its heavily corrupted politicians, Britain is now willingly serving the darkest possible racist national ideology and supporting a criminal terrorist state.

British politicians and media are caught in bed with too many Zionist wolfs. In order to reclaim sovereignty and dignity, Britain must de-Zionise itself immediately.

The Stray dog?

Which Hidden
Power Created Hitler?
By Henry Makow PhD

So this political genius who allegedly master minded the takeover of Germany with a group of other mediocre misfits, and mesmerized the nation couldn't pass a simple exam for the German postal service. His school records confirm his below average intelligence and performance all round. Maybe he was one of those late developers? Sarcasm intended. A perennial social outcast unable to fit in, with homosexual tendencies. Eventually worked for German intelligence in Bavaria. Amazing what a bit of Jew financed PR can do. America be aware.

______________________________________________

The man who became the personification of evil probably was the puppet of larger forces still in control of the world.

This view is supported by a curious little-known document entitled "I was Hitler's Boss" by Captain Karl Meyr published in the New York- based magazine /"Current History"/ (November 1941.) HERE

As Hitler's boss in the "Instruction Dept." of the Reichwehr in Munich, Capt. Mayr had "daily contact" with Hitler for 15 mos. (March 1919- June 1920.) Corporal Hitler was charged with propaganda functions and infiltrating labor groups.

Mayr portrays Hitler as a "tired stray dog looking for a master," a mere factotum first of General Ludendorff and then of Goering, considered dispensable after fulfilling his purpose.

While I believe Captain Mayr, who later opposed Hitler (and died at Buchenwald) wrote the essay, it may be "black propaganda." Published the month before the US entered the war, it may be designed to create division between Hitler and his designated successor (Goering), and to anger Hitler by belittling him.

The editor of "Current History" was "Spencer Brodney." His real name was Leon Brotzky, and he was a long time Communist. "Current History" was published quarterly by the /New York Times/ Company, the organ of the central banking cartel.

Nevertheless, although black propaganda spins the truth, its effectiveness depends on including a considerable amount of fact. Much of what Mayr says is consistent with other sources. I will provide a summary of his most credible revelations and then briefly consider the implications.

TOO STUPID TO BE A MAILMAN

Capt. Mayr says that in 1919, Hitler was "one of the many thousand of ex-soldiers who walked the streets looking for work. A this time, Hitler was ready to throw in his lot with anyone who would show him kindness...He would have worked for a Jewish or French employer just as readily as for an Aryan". He was "totally unconcerned about the German people and their destinies."

He "tried to enter the postal service as a mail carrier. His services were refused because he was unable to pass the intelligence test. His school education in his Austrian village would have been quite sufficient, but his mental capacity suffered after he was gassed in the war."

Hitler "talked and walked in his sleep and made himself generally a nuisance." He had no friends, and was shy and self conscious because of a "deformity [which] made him unlike other men-in my opinion this infliction made Hitler a lone wolf and outsider." [Hitler apparently had only one testicle. Funny that Mayr doesn't mention this detail if he is trying to discredit Hitler. ] Hitler was "continually chaffed by his comrades."

ERICH LUDENDORFF AND THE "HITLER EXPERIMENT "

According to Mayr, General Erich Ludendorff (1865-1937) the hero of World War One met weekly with a coterie of industrialists at the Hotel Four Seasons in Munich and plotted vengeance for Germany's World War One loss.

The challenge was to mobilize the dispirited German worker to fight again. Ludendorff decided they needed a Joan D'Arc figure, a common person who heard God's voice, to lead them into battle. He even roamed the Bavarian Alps looking for a "red headed peasant girl" who could be sold as a divine messenger.

Ludendorff and his friends " were like Hollywood scouts looking for talent..." At the same time Hitler was involved in an army "experiment." He was given money to hold meetings of the German Workers Party in taverns and buy everyone beer, sausages and pretzels. After some rousing songs, when everyone felt "happy and grateful," Hitler would jump on a chair or a table and started with "fellow-workers, Germany, awake!"

"In such a genial atmosphere it was a pleasure for workers to awake and manly applaud everything." Mayr writes. "The experiment with Hitler considered highly successful by his sponsors." Hitler got the job of being Joan D'Arc.

"The programme was carefully concocted to fit with the wishful thinking of the majority." The leaders knew "a minority must suffer, and so the German Jews were made the chief scapegoats because their destruction would gain millions of votes for the Nazis. Small shopkeepers hated Jews because they owned the chain stores; farmers wished their destruction because

they were indebted to Jewish bankers; even intellectuals were jealous because Jews held lucrative positions in the arts and sciences and professions. The Communists also had to be destroyed, but that was because they took their orders from Russia and would never vote for an Imperial Germany."

"The Nazis salesmen offered anything and everything to make the people war minded...Therefore, their sales talk was: Germany is a have-not country; other nations have all the wealth; Germany must fight them successfully, and so be entitled to that wealth."

Thus the Nazis catered always to the desires of majority. "No one cared what happened to Germany as long as the result was restoration of the good old days..."

Hitler was looked upon as "a good salesman for the Nazi ideology, who would be paid off when he was no longer needed."

HITLER THE FIGUREHEAD

Mayr maintains that Hitler never was the real leader of Nazis. "As a leader, Hitler is probably the greatest hoax ever played on the world... His reports always had to be rewritten... His intellect was not higher than that of an eight-year-old child... Hitler has never been capable of making a decision of his own...he certainly never wrote a line of "Mein Kampf"; ...[but] was of course proud to sign his name as author of a book."

"Before every important speech Hitler was, sometimes for days, closeted with Hess who in some unknown way, got Hitler into that frenetic state in which he came forth to address the public. Just before Hitler had appointments to receive statesmen or foreign correspondents, he was minutely coached as what to say. Sometimes when unexpected questions were put to him, he just walked away, or started his senseless political ranting."

Ludendorff soon lost control of Hitler to Ernst Roehm and Hermann Goering who engaged in a bitter war for Nazi supremacy that lasted a decade. Finally Goering won the battle in blood purge of June 30, 1934. By this time, Mayr had become associated with Roehm. We assume this is the basis of his information.

"The way was now clear for Goering and he lost no time. Conscription; occupation of the Rhineland; total rearmament; intervention in Spain; invasion of Austria, Czechoslovakia, Poland and other countries followed."

"Germany has many Fausts, but their Mephistopheles is Goering who was able, through crafty propagandists like Goebbels, to sell Hitler to the entire world as a patriotic superman. Goering alone engineered the burning of the Reichstag and had a feeble minded boy executed for it...It was he that arranged that Hitler got the false material to convince him that Roehm intended to kill him unless he killed Roehm first. Goering's fawning on Hitler sheer hypocrisy designed to mislead public opinion."

The prevalent view is that Goering was an ineffectual leader, who preferred to go hunting and collect (steal) art than run the Luftwaffe. Supposedly he lived in fear of Hitler.

CONCLUSION

Mayr's view of Hitler is in stark contrast with the conventional one. Either Mayr is lying or the majority of modern historians are engaged in building Hitler up to seem like a credible leader and personification of evil.

I believe that Hitler was stage managed by the Illuminati, i.e. Masons organized around the Rothschild's desire for world tyranny to protect their monopoly on credit. I believe someone like Lionel Rothschild was referring to a Hitler figure when he wrote in the "Protocols of Zion":

The Secret Masonry is setting up "our own, to all appearance, off position, which in at least one of its organs will present what looks like the very antipodes to us. Our real opponents at heart will accept this simulated opposition as their own and will show us their cards." (Protocol 12.11)

Jon Bjerknes has shown that the Rothschilds belonged to a heretical Jewish sect, the Sabbateans, who believed that, as King of the Jews. the Rothschilds were destined to rule the world.HERE

Did Ernst Stavros Blofeld really write the Protocols. Certainly SMERSH would be proud.

In the Protocols, Lionel Rothschild, talks about his world control by virtue of his credit monopoly. He says that when he "comes into [his] kingdom," he'll make sure private individuals like himself no longer exercise this power.HERE

He also says that if any state raises an objection to Rothschild domination, "it is only pro forma, at our discretion, and by our direction, for their anti-Semitism is indispensable to us for the management of our lesser brethren." (Protocol 9)

My current hypothesis is that there is a direct line between Hitler and the Rothschild agenda, through a long line of "cutouts" (agents). Some of these cutouts were "useful idiots" like Erich Ludendorff who retired from politics when he realized Hitler was financed by Rothschild's Bank of England.

The Jew, Max Warburg, head of German Intelligence.

Certainly Max Warburg, Chief of German Army Intelligence, member of the banking family, and Meyr's real boss, was the Rothschild point man in the "Hitler Experiment." Through the "secret masonry" the central bankers created both Communism and Nazism which, thanks to WWII, advanced the destruction of Western (Christian) civilization.

The human race is fast becoming the Rothschilds' ant farm. Thanks to their control over the media and education (through cutouts), information and entertainment are mostly tools for social control and behavior modification. Obscure documents like Captain Mayr's "I was Hitler's Boss" remind us that we are manipulated in the most egregious manner.

__________________________________________

Hitler Used Rothschild Banker's Typewriter

Did Illuminati Bankers hire Hitler to Start WWII?

Did Bormann Run Hitler for the Illuminati?