Mostaque Ali: 10/25

The Demoncrats are worse than Trump. Let's make that clear.

Just because they smile more, and have more ethnic people talking and fronting them doesn't make them better than the GOP. It is the first true Globalist Party of the USA, starting with Saint Jimmy Carter and his disastrous one-term administration. Kumbaya my lord, doesn't solve the USA's fundamental problems.

''Virtue signalling'' to the Rothschilds.

The Globalist Demoncrats started the race to the bottom, and the Republicans more or less without exception have followed them there. Let me elaborate, if Trump seems bad, the Demoncrats are way worse:

My beef with the Demoncrats.

1. From the late 1970's the Demoncrats sponsored Islamic fascists, and then upped the ante in 2011 with the so called ''Arab Spring'', after giving a Kumbaya speech in Cairo in 2009, by Obummer.

Really bad cardboard cartoons

(i) ''al-Qaeda'' materialised in the 1990's under the Clintons

(ii) The Taliban from 1994 under the Clintons, and Sandy Berger

(iii) ISIS from 2014 under Obummer and Hitlery

(iv) The mullahs of Iran 1979, under Saint Jimmy Carter

(v) The Afghan Mujaheddin from 1979, under Saint Jimmy Carter and Zbigniew Brzezinski

The Demon-crats are the most EVIL ILLEGAL organisation on planet earth, anti-Human, Satanic.

Whilst the world moves forward in the 21st century, they mercilessly and maliciously condemn 1.5 billion Muslims to Medieval, backwards SERVITUDE.

(vi) Ilhan Omar entered the USA in 1995, under the aegis of the Clintons. She is a psy-ops against Muslims in America. Her role is to say bizarre, ill-considered crazy things openly in Congress and outside, and Fox News then attacks her as yet another example of crazy Muslims; Islamophobia; a punch bag, and a dainty looking female--I pity her because I don't think her State Department handlers have informed her of her real ''acting'' role--witless, low-IQ patsy. On the other hand, from abject poverty, she has become self-educated at College, and a multi-millionaires--OK, good job. BTW Muslim women don't wear turbans mostly, somebody tell her State Department handlers. Most Muslims are not from black Africa, either.

Chinese Yi ethnic women do, but they are definitely NOT dangerous.

(vii) Minnesota, under the Clintons and the State Department, has also been flooded with Somalis since the 1990s. My hometown in the UK was also flooded with Somali refugees in the 1990s. It is a cold, cold state, up North, where black Africans fare less well. It is traditionally occupied by Nordic Scandinavian people, who have built the state into what it is today. I guess this is more Jewish social engineering.

Beijing Tim Waltz

2. Flooded the USA with illegal, unskilled migrants from Latin America. This represents a great security risk to the country and its social cohesion. 11-40 million illegals in the USA. American security must have been sleeping, in between building hooker hotels in the Philippines.

3. They want China to replace the USA, as per the wishes of the Rothschilds. To do this, they must sabotage the USA strategically and help China with USA technology companies.

APPLE, NVIDIA and TESLA only make in China, including dual-use military reverse engineering to KILL American personnel.
AND, re-export to Russia, Mullah Iran .....and the world, as Chinese technology/weapons.

4. They passed the notorious Crime Bill of 1994, which massively increased the USA prison population. The crime bill targeted men of colour primarily, and poor working-class white males, the very constituency they say they represent. Since the Crime Bill was passed, there has been no attempt to reform it in any shape or form. Converting America into Gulag America.

Comrade Stalin's Gulags

5. The Demoncrats obsess over WOKE, LBGTQ+I, contrary to the wishes of the silent majority population. In Barack Obummer, they have deliberately elected a leader who is gay, and his wife is a transvestite. This is worse than Sodom and Gomorrah. There has to be a level of moral clarity for a nation to survive.

On his last day in power he obsesses about tranny toilets. Good job Mr. President.

Roman orgies, homosexuality, and obsession with foodies during the declining period of the Roman Empire .....along with currency debasement, inflation AND an overextended empire WITH TOO MANY FOREIGN COMMITMENTS. Unsustainable 600,000 military machine, bloated military budget, and security interference in the REPUBLIC.

Paetorian Guard (CIA--electing, choosing and killing the Caesars, in the USA: JFK, RFK, NIXON, Carter, BUSH 1, BUSH 2, OBUMMER both PARENTS CIA, and BIDEN).

Paranoid ''limited'' Security men don't ever make good kingmakers; just an indication of a declining, bankrupt society--Stasi East Germany, Soviet Union KGB, especially in the 1980s when they took over the state, Yuri Andropov.

Markus Wolf 'Mischa' of the Hauptverwaltung Aufklärung.

6. It is the party where the majority of American Jews vote--approaching 80%. It is their run party, with their ''liberal'' agendas.

What you do is simple. You flood the Western country with illegal foreigners, and nobody will notice how truly bizarre YOU are with your cult-like Bongo Bongo North African ''religion''- Not that far from Ilan Omars homeland -Talmud Torah--DIY how to scam the world. RACISM 101, GLOBALISM 101. Then you get Mike Huckabee and his type to fight your battles, because if you do the dirty work, it will appear too obvious.

7. They take money from big businesses, or corporate Demoncrats, contrary to the wishes of the grass roots progressive movement, and Gyorg Schwarz. They take money from ISRAEL. But they wax lyrical about how they are fighting for the common man.

8. Most shamefully, they copy the agendas of a foreign power, namely the LABOUR PARTY of the UK. ''The greatest nation on earth'' Democrats have a deep need to copy and paste a foreign power, because the DNC doesn't have any ideas of their own???!!!! How about listening to the progressive grassroots for once--pretty sure they have lots of ideas.

9. The first GLOBALIST PARTY in American history are the Demoncrats. Under Saint Jimmy Carter. Christian evangelist, former spy, and peanuts farmer from the Deep South. A all-smiling Moron, who initiated the ''Arch of Crisis'' against Muslim countries--essentially a religious war from the Medieval period.

Nobody but the Rothschilds wanted a religious war. Definitely not the 57 Muslim majority countries, who send their children and loot to Western capitals for investment. A few Muslim countries have been falsely converted into Bugaloo anti-Western countries like Mullah Iran, and Taliban Afghanistan, but the ordinary majority in these countries don't want to fight ''The West''.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YUkObNlWjsI

We are not asking the American Empire to come back to Afghanistan, after the Demon-crats FIXED the 175,000 Taliban back into power in Kabul in 2021. Wasting $1-2 trillion of American taxpayer money doing absolutely NOTHING posing for the cameras, AND STEALING AFGHAN NATIONAL TREASURES (3).

10. The Demoncrats have created Sanctuary cities, which aim to destabilise the USA in a significant way, and its security.

NOT EVEN ISRAEL WOULD TOLERATE SUCH A SITUATION.

_________________________________________________

Academic Analysis: Democratic Party and Political Destabilization in America

This analysis, based on extensive research from U.S. universities and academic institutions, examines scholarly perspectives on concerns about the Democratic Party's role in American political dynamics, drawing from over 100 academic sources and peer-reviewed studies.

Graphs showing percent decline in U.S. democracy indices from Economist Intelligence Unit, Freedom House, and V-Dem over the last decade.

Executive Summary

Academic research reveals a complex and nuanced picture rather than evidence supporting the theory that the Democratic Party represents a singularly "dangerous and destabilizing" force. Instead, studies demonstrate that both major political parties contribute to democratic challenges, with institutional erosion occurring through bipartisan mechanisms rather than unilateral party actions.^[1]^[2]^[3]^[4]^[5]

Key Academic Findings

Political Polarization: A Bipartisan Challenge

Research from Northwestern University's Kellogg School of Management reveals significant partisan differences in how parties engage with scientific evidence. While Democratic-controlled congressional committees cite scientific research 1.8 times more frequently than Republican counterparts, and left-leaning think tanks cite science 5 times more than right-leaning ones, scholars note this disparity reflects different approaches to governance rather than institutional sabotage.^[1]

Yale University political scientist Ian Shapiro argues that weak political parties themselves - not any single party - drive polarization, with both Democrats and Republicans becoming subject to "control by unrepresentative voters on their fringes and those who fund them".^[6]

Increasing ideological polarization between Democrats and Republicans in the U.S. Congress from 1973 to 2012, based on Pew Research Center data.

Elite Capture and Institutional Control

Cambridge University research on elite capture demonstrates that powerful factions across the political spectrum can hijack democratic processes. The phenomenon affects both progressive and conservative movements, with scholars noting that "any policy-making public institution can be targeted by elite capture".^[7]

Studies from Princeton and other institutions reveal that Democratic elites show higher trust in scientific institutions (96% express complete or partial trust in scientists versus 64% of Republican elites), but this creates its own democratic tensions around technocratic governance.^[1]^[8]

Identity Politics and Democratic Tensions

Stanford University and London School of Economics research explores how identity politics creates genuine tensions with universal democratic principles. However, scholars argue these tensions stem from structural injustices rather than inherent anti-democratic impulses. The structural theory of obligation suggests that identity-based claims often signal "the failure of the liberal state to provide for all citizens the type of equal treatment that liberal democratic justice requires".^[9]^[10]

Illustration of people actively protesting and engaging with symbols of the Republican Party, reflecting political division and activism in America.

Case Studies from Academic Literature

Case Study 1: Scientific Citation and Policy-Making

Institution: Northwestern University, James Madison University
Study: 25-year analysis of U.S. policy documents (1995-2021)
Findings: Democratic committees and left-leaning think tanks cite peer-reviewed science more frequently, but only 5-6% of cited papers overlap between parties. This suggests parallel but separate evidence bases rather than one party systematically undermining institutions.^[1]

Case Study 2: Democratic Backsliding Mechanisms

Institution: Brookings Institution, V-Dem Institute
Study: Cross-national analysis of democratic erosion
Findings: U.S. democratic decline occurs through two primary mechanisms: strategic election manipulation and executive aggrandizement. Critically, Republican control of state government "dramatically reduces states' democratic performance" more than Democratic control.^[3]

Case Study 3: Economic Inequality and Democracy

Institution: University of Chicago
Study: Large cross-national statistical analysis
Findings: Economic inequality emerges as one of the strongest predictors of democratic erosion, affecting both wealthy and longstanding democracies. This suggests structural economic factors rather than party ideology drive institutional instability.^[5]

Voting booth with a saw blade poised to destabilize it, symbolizing threats to American electoral democracy.

Institutional Impact Analysis

Progressive Politics and Academic Freedom

Research from multiple universities reveals that both progressive and conservative movements challenge academic freedom, but through different mechanisms. Florida's "Stop WOKE Act" represents conservative restrictions, while progressive movements sometimes create pressure for ideological conformity.^[11]^[12]

Social Movement Effects

Harvard and other institutions document that social movements can both strengthen and destabilize democratic norms. Black Lives Matter and other progressive movements have enhanced democratic participation for marginalized groups while sometimes employing "transgressive politics" that challenge established norms.^[13]

Comparative International Context

Carnegie Endowment research places U.S. democratic challenges in global comparative perspective. The analysis finds that while the U.S. shows signs of democratic backsliding, the pattern follows international trends affecting democracies worldwide rather than being uniquely attributable to American progressive politics.^[4]

Scatter plot showing changes in democracy and authoritarianism scores of countries from 2000 to 2016 according to V-Dem data.

Scholarly Consensus and Limitations

Areas of Academic Agreement

1. Bipartisan Nature of Democratic Decline: Multiple studies confirm that democratic erosion in the U.S. involves both parties ^[2]^[3]^[8]

2. Structural Causes: Economic inequality, weak institutions, and polarization transcend party lines ^[5]^[14]

3. Elite Capture Risks: All political movements face risks of elite capture and institutional manipulation ^[7]^[15]

Methodological Limitations

Scholars acknowledge several limitations in studying partisan effects on democracy:

· Difficulty isolating party-specific impacts from broader structural changes ^[3]

· Selection bias in measuring democratic norms and their erosion ^[16]

· Temporal constraints in assessing long-term institutional effects ^[17]

Conclusion

Academic research from U.S. universities does not support the theory that the Democratic Party represents a uniquely "dangerous and destabilizing" force in American politics. Instead, scholarly evidence points to:

1. Systemic challenges affecting both major parties

2. Structural economic and social factors driving democratic stress

3. Bipartisan contributions to polarization and institutional strain

4. Complex relationships between political movements and democratic norms

While legitimate concerns exist about certain progressive policies and approaches, the academic consensus indicates that democratic challenges in America stem from broader systemic issues rather than the actions of any single political party.^[3]^[4]^[5]^[8]

The research suggests that strengthening American democracy requires bipartisan commitment to institutional norms and addressing underlying structural inequalities rather than focusing exclusively on one party's alleged destabilizing effects.^[4]^[18]^[8]

(DON'T HOLD YOUR BREATH UNLESS YOU'VE GOT HICCUPS)

⁂CITATIONS: