Endless American threats by Memsahib Hitlery

.
.
.
.
Since 2001 American has been threatening Pakistan every year with dire consequences.

Quite often a lot of these very public threats have been made because of the perceived requirements of the incumbent American administration's Domestic POLITICAL NEEDS.........bash and talk dirty with the Third World slave puppet power, and the Jews and the Nascar class in America will be happy.

Obummer, wrongly wishes to be elected again as President, based on his great record over the past 3 years. Hitlery also wants to have a go at the Presidency maybe.

Threatening Pakistan is easy for the Americans, and the Pakistani military top brass make it EASIER for the Americans to do so over the last 10 years.

It has become a Pro Forma Ceremony.....The Americans arrive apparently for "negotiations" then make a set of absurd demands, the Pakistanis rebut the absurd demands, and the Americans leave with threats on the table.

The fact of the matter is of course...if you convert a Third World country like Afghanistan into a huge Opium plantation, put the local mafia in charge, with American troops killing civilians every where, subvert the society by empowering a minority (Classic colonial social engineering).......ALL ruled over by a corrupt inept puppet "President" with no real power in Kabul.............then maybe a few Afghans might not be happy about this FUNDAMENTAL set-up and subsequently may revolt. International law says these revolting few have the right to resist the invasion of their homeland by illegal marauding foreign powers who are also unaccountable.

Pakistan's role, sanctioned by the USA in this FUNDAMENTAL set-up of USA failure in Afghanistan is therefore incidental, save for the fact that the Pakistani military carry out military operations against the Taliban in FATA paid for by the Americans, and sustain the American occupation of the hapless country with logistics through Pakistan.

Haqqani this and Haqqani that is irrelevant with his few thousand militia...... poorly trained, led, and armed with AK-47 and RPG's. Nobody should be seriously suggesting that 3000 tribal militia's are a serious threat to the Western War Machine of 250,000 troops and mercenaries based in Afghanistan......and the Pentagon is shitting in their pants because of Haqqani this and Haqqani that.

For the Harijan Coolie's in Pakistan, clearly all such threats Psy-ops or otherwise is not good for the country. Such threats should be used to encourage the Harijan Coolie to seek greater complete separation from the West, especially of Western military personnel in Pakistan, Diplomatic personnel, Western tourists, Western NGO's, Western business operations.

These issues have been discussed in the previous post.

Pakistan should not be used for electioneering in the USA Presidential race, but is.

Obummer's approval rating falls to new low, as does his foreign policy

____________________________

Clinton Threatens Pakistan With ‘Unilateral’ Moves Over Haqqani Network

Another Diplomatic Visit Decays Into Open Threats

by Jason Ditz, at antiwar.com

Yesterday officials were talking about the importance of “pulling out all the stops” as several top US officials arrived in Pakistan to press the Pakistani government on the Haqqani Network. It was not the first time top officials were sent to Pakistan on a vital mission, but all previous trips ended in failure, with US officials loudly condemning Pakistan and threatening the government.

Today, the current trip appears to have suffered the same fate, as Secretary of State Hillary Clinton warned Pakistan would pay a “big price” if they continued to ignore US demands, and threatened unspecified “unilateral” acts.

Officials say the meetings lasted around four hours, and included both Pakistan’s top military commander Gen. Parvez Kayani and the ISI chief Lt. General Ahmed Shuja Pasha. They reportedly ended with a promise to meet again Friday and to not discuss the situation in between.

Pakistani officials slammed Secretary Clinton for her threats, saying they did not help with the atmosphere of the extremely important Friday talks. It seems that as usual, however, the US is preparing for the talks to fail and for another opportunity to condemn Pakistan. Some officials just jumped the gun on their longstanding policy.

Avoid being a colony of the West, even an Islamist colony.

.
.
.
.
Clearly as it has been repeated many times by so many that to avoid Western Imperialist designs one must do some basic safety steps to avoid a repetition of Western colonialism in Third World nations:

One must make sure that the Third World country's military have NO relationship with Western countries, especially with education, training and joint exercises. China and Russia can fill such requirements, since both countries do not have the arrogant criminal ambition to intervene in Third World nations, they are a safer bet. The USA used the Pentagon trained and armed Tunisian and Egyptian military to overthrow the former Arab dictators, Ben Ali and Hosni Mubarak. Both countries are NOW totally destabilized, and failing with Islamists on the rise.

There must be no relationship between the intelligence services of the West with those of the Third World. A lot of regimes have fallen when such relationships were developed, for example with the Shah of Iran's head of SAVAK worked with the West to topple his own master.

The same applies with the police forces of Third World Nations. One must look at history, and not lose sight of Colonial crimes and genocides perpetrated in many Third World nations by Western countries.

Finally of course the political and economic elite of the Third World country, and the issue of where they invest their wealth and where they send their children for education.

Both Tunisia and Egypt forgot these basic safety measures as they chased the rich nation's and their wealth....and now they are both suffering, AND in addition have emboldened the Western Imperialists to seek greater empires in North Africa and Africa generally (Maybe for its minerals).

Friendship with pro-active Western nations is not feasible EVER, and thus a safe polite distance of peaceful co-existence and mistrust must be sought. History should guide us to this fact.

There are those who will argue that many nations have prospered under American control and rule as defacto colonies, even with fixed elections. Countries such as Germany, Japan and South Korea.

In the case of Germany it is a Western country in Central Europe, and it is inconceivable that it would be allowed to slide to Third World standards in the midst of such Western wealth. One can also argue that even without American Marshal Plan assistance in the 1940's and 1950's, Germany would still be a successful rich country despite the Americans. It was a rich country before the Americans occupied it in 1945.

The same latter argument could be made in relation to Japan and South Korea. Japan was a modern industrialized country, with a huge modern navy before the Americans occupied the country in 1945.

In the case of the Philippines things have not gone so well.

Despite being ardent Catholic Christians of whom most speak good English, and an American colony since 1898, the country is in dire straights. 10 million skilled good Philippino scour the world looking to work abroad, and they send their money back to the country.

113 years of American control of the Philippines has not brought anything good for the country except corruption, instability and poverty. No visible progression in development over time......save for the abundance of Americanized strip bars, go-go dancers and whore houses.

The Philippines, Iraq and Afghanistan are the examples which Third World nations must study when they relate to Western pro-active powers. Studying history thus will help. Russian and Chinese military hardware and training is just as good as the Imperialist West, but the two countries are less dangerous.

______________________________

THE NEW TUNISIA - AFTER THE CIA COUP by aangirfan.

The eggs psy-ops are in the background.........

The New Tunisia. In Tunisia, the CIA's Islamists are set for big election gains

After the 23 October 2011 elections in Tunisia, the Islamist Ennahda Party is expected to be the biggest party in the assembly. Already, Islamist Salafists have attacked cinemas and TV stations for showing material that is not sufficiently Islamist. Under Ben Ali, who was recently toppled by the CIA, tourists were welcomed, polygamy was outlawed, there were no forced marriages and men and women were equal in terms of rights. Ennahda is said to be behind the attacks by the Salafists. Ennahda's leader, Ghannouchi, describes the Salafists as "brothers." Ennahda is reported to have links to the CIA's Muslim Brotherhood.


The New Tunisia

The CIA's revolution in Tunisia has caused a massive downturn in Tunisia's economy. There are few tourists. There is massive unemployment. Tunisia and the other Arab Spring countries have all been hit hard economically.

(The Arab Spring upheaval cost $55bn - BBC.com)


"Their costs to GDP amount to $20.56bn while costs to public finance total $35.28bn. "These figures do not take into account losses to human life, infrastructure damage and business and foreign direct investment losses."
The USA-Israel-NATO wants control of Africa. Website for this image

According to the UK government's Tunisia travel advice: "Political demonstrations and industrial protests still occur regularly... "Incidents of pick pocketing and bag snatching and petty theft are on the increase and you are advised to ensure that bags are kept close to your person at all times... "A number of fringe groups have sought to impose their interpretation of Islamic dress/ behaviour upon others through violence against individuals." Tunisia's military boss, General Ammar, with his CIA-Pentagon-NATO buddies.


No matter who wins the elections, the CIA-generals will remain in power. General Rachid Ammar is Chief of General Staff of the Tunisian military. Reportedly Ammar was part of the CIA plot to topple Ben Ali. Reportedly Ammar is part of the CIA plot to wreck Libya. According to "The political elite of the new Libya", by AA Bystrov (Imes – Original Russian): "The anti-Gaddafi TNC rebels met in the Hotel Tibesti in Tunisia... "The Chief of General Staff of the Tunisian armed forces, Rachid Ammar, was in charge of supplying arms and ammunition to the Libyan rebels... "Paris dictated to the Tunisian leadership through figures such as ... Dominique De Villepin."

_________________________

Much has been achieved with this CIA agent, as he helped the USA overthrow his own government, and then worked against Gaddafi to overthrow his regime........and the destabilization of Egypt, and who knows Syria.

President Sabourjian shouldn't have been elected for the second term

.
.
.
.
Ahmedinejad's only skill, if one could accept the validity of this fact, is that he is very good at making populist speeches....he is all sound but no content. He is a disaster abroad, and he is a disaster at home.

It is intriguing why the mullahs chose Ahmedinejad to front their very real power from 2005, and why they helped him win in a clearly fraudulent second term in 2009......and why they still cling to him after 6 years of repeated disaster.

On the other hand being "President" within a mullacracy is not a easy task, and Ahmedinejad had no real power to exercise in the first place, except make speeches for the mullahs in power, as a civilian front from the poorer sections of Iranian society.

Scrapping the position of President will have no real effect on the power structure of Iran, accept reveal to us who actually runs Iran, and who exactly fixes the elections in Iran.

The main threat and problem of Iran is the mullahs who were put into power by the USA/UK 32 years ago. Iran therefore needs an internal revolution against the mullahs, and their strange policies which have led to 5,000,000 quality Iranians leaving their sacred country in the first place, taking with them $1500 billion worth of Iranian national assets, along with their vital skills.

Mahmoud Sabourjian is merely a powerless front of this original REAL PROBLEM--the mullahs themselves.

____________________

Khamenei: Iran Could Scrap Presidency in the Future

Comments Seen as Warning to Ahmadinejad

by Jason Ditz at antiwar.com

Speaking today, Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei suggested that the current presidential system in Iran might not last forever, adding that “there would be no problem” in scrapping the office entirely in favor of a parliamentary system.

Considering the on-again, off-again feud between Khamenei and Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, the comments are seen as a warning that the controversial president might find not only his job in danger, but the office entirely.

The two engaged in a rare public battle earlier this year, with Ahmadinejad refusing to show up at cabinet meetings in the second half of April to protest being overruled by Khamenei on a cabinet firing. A number of key clerics and top political figures have been openly demanding Ahmadinejad’s ouster since then.

The position of president in Iran doesn’t carry nearly the power it does in other presidential systems, and in practice it is little more than an Interior Ministry with a fancier title. The title, and Ahmadinejad’s tendency to make controversial comments in the international press have been a major headache for Iran’s foreign policy since he was elected.

It might well be that, given Iran’s rather unique political system, a prime minister would be less of a hassle. Such a position would likely be filled with aging MPs with considerable political savvy instead of fiery speakers like Ahmadinejad.

Obummer on the rampage.

.
.
.
.

Globalist Warlord Obama (and International drug peddler) Moves to Expand Africom Reach

Kurt Nimmo at Infowars.com

In addition to his wars in Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, those underway in Yemen and Somalia – and coming soon in Iran – the warlord Obama is now dispatching troops to Uganda to do battle with the wacky yet murderous Lord’s Resistance Army (LRA).

Obama’s move is next step following on the heels of Gaddafi’s defeat in Libya. Obama is following to the letter a well-drafted globalist plan for Africa, one that is partially enumerated in the the LRA Disarmament and Northern Uganda Recovery Bill adopted by the U.S. Congress in 2009 and signed by Obama in early 2010. It “requires the US government to develop a new multifaceted strategy” against the LRA.

“Obama has said he is sending about 100 US soldiers to Uganda to help regional forces battle the notorious Lord’s Resistance Army,” the BBC reported on Friday. “Although combat-equipped, the troops would be providing information and advice ‘to partner nation forces,’ Mr Obama wrote in a letter to US Congress.”

Obama didn’t bother to consult Congress or abide by the Constitution. He just sent congressional leaders a letter announcing he would again violate the national sovereignty of yet another country.

“Obama’s announcement represents a highly unusual intervention for the United States,” reports the Associated Press. “Although some American troops are based in Djibouti [at the $6 billion Africom mega-base] and small groups of soldiers have been deployed to Somalia, the U.S. traditionally has been reluctant to commit forces to help African nations put down insurgencies.”

As usual, the exact opposite is the case – the U.S. military, the CIA, and their European partners manufacture insurgencies – the preferred destabilization method for the bankers.......of Third World Nations.

(Taliban, "al-CIA-duh", Muslim Brotherhood, Abu Sayef, Remano, Mullahs of Iran..............and color coded revolutions with "People power" being other examples)

The AP dredges up the “humanitarian crises” of Rwanda and Bosnia as cover for Obama’s move. “The change in policy could reflect the long-standing concerns of a number of high-ranking Obama advisers left scarred by the U.S. failure in the 1990s to intervene to stop the genocide in Rwanda and the belated action to finally halt the violence in Bosnia. For a current parallel, the Lord’s Resistance Army’s 24-year campaign of rebellion, rape and murder represents one of the world’s worst human rights crises today.”

Despite the brutality of the LRC, the AP has naturally declined to tell us the whole story. Uganda is a strategic asset for the United States. Back in 2005, investigative journalist Wayne Madsen reported that the U.S. had major communications and listening stations in Uganda’s Ruwenzori Mountains. Since then, Africom has set-up a sprawling operation there. Libya was its first “engagement.”

Moreover, the genocide in Rwanda was not simply blood lust between Tutsi and Hutu tribes, as dramatically depicted by the media at the time, but was ignited by several causes, most notably the intervention of the IMF in central Africa’s economy and its standard debt serving schemes resulting in famine and armed conflict, thus allowing the globalists to consolidate power.

“While the new loans [distributed to Rwanda] contributed to releasing money for the payment of debt servicing as well as equipping the armed forces, the evidence would suggest that a large part of this donor assistance was neither used productively nor was it channeled into providing relief in areas affected by famine,” writes Michel Chossudovsky.

In what is now a well-established pattern, the global elite exploited tensions created by the disastrous economic impact of its loan sharking operation and moved to establish a sphere of influence in a region historically dominated by the former colonial powers of France and Belgium.

“The civil war in Rwanda was a brutal struggle for political power between the Hutu-led Habyarimana government supported by France, and the Tutsi Rwandan Patriotic Front (RPF) backed financially and militarily by Washington,” Chossudovsky concludes. “Ethnic rivalries were used deliberately in the pursuit of geopolitical objectives. Both the CIA and French intelligence were involved.”

The IMF and World Bank played a cynical and murderous game in Uganda as well. Banker money ostensibly earmarked for the country’s economic and social reconstruction went to military destabilization operations in Rwanda and the Congo.

The Congo: A mineral rich prize for the globalists.

“The Ugandan external debt was being used to finance these military operations on behalf of Washington with the country and its people ultimately footing the bill. In fact by curbing social expenditures, the austerity measures had facilitated the reallocation of State of revenue in favor of the Ugandan military,” Chossudovsky explains.

The LRC threat, cited on Friday in Obama’s less than obligatory letter to Congress, has been amplified by the presence of Africom in the country. “Critics have argued that not enough was done to protect civilians from the LRA rebels, who hacked, bludgeoned and bayoneted their way through nearby villages as they fled the joint military operation involving troops from Congo, Uganda and Sudan” under Africom direction, Stars and Stripes reported in 2009.

Africa is one of several targets of the globalists as they move to grab vital natural resources, consolidate power and unleash their monetary enslavement and world totalitarian government end game around the world. Remarkably, the self-destructive hubris of the elite is revealing itself as they attempt to accomplish overly ambitious goals in the Middle East, Central and South Asia, and Africa.

In their arrogance, the international banksters believe their engineered destruction of national economies and aggressive military destabilization plans simultaneously unleashed around the world will result in a situation where humanity will be obliged to crawl to them and beg for world government, as globalist minion Henry Kissinger intimated back in the 1990s.

In fact, as the growing but as of yet largely untutored “Occupy” movements reveal, a growing number of people in the West – in the belly of the beast, so to speak – are beginning to mobilize in resistance, despite the color revolution counter moves by the global elite and their intelligence apparatus to defuse the movement. At this point, it remains to be seen if the people can successfully identify the target and act coherently in opposition.

The USA government is complicit in the International drugs trade........using the Intelligence agencies and military.

.
.
.
.
For all their verbal eloquence, and positions with titles within the State, at the end of the day Hilary Clinton and Obama are just glorified drug peddlers of International Jewry.

This explains the appallingly poor rule of USA governments in recent years in that country, and why average Americans are unhappy with their government.

Glorified drug peddlers with eloquent words at the end of the day never make good rational statesmen of an otherwise sophisticated nation.

This also explains why American and British security "insist" on staying on in Afghanistan, long after their welcome has outlasted.

Let fate allow the USA State to destroy itself.......soon, so that a new "Just State" may arise from its present evil, criminal incarnation......led by a few International Jews and their WASP fronts.

This will also allow the USA criminal poodles to moderate their intentions accordingly from the Western hemisphere mainly.

One cannot take "Civilization" to the next level with International Jew drug peddlers.

____________________________

UN: Afghan opium production up by 61%

By Presstv.com

A recent UN report says insecurity and rising opium prices have driven Afghan farmers to increase cultivation of the illicit drug despite the presence of nearly 150,000 foreign troops in the country.

The UN said in its report on Tuesday that cultivation of the poppy crop reached 131,000 hectares in 2011, seven percent higher than in 2010 "due to insecurity and high prices", AFP reported.

The report added that overall opium production in Afghanistan would potentially rise by 61 percent in 2011 as the crop yield per hectare rose markedly from last year.

The price of dry opium also rose 43 percent this year compared to 2010, and total farm-gate income is set to increase by 133 percent to reach $1.4 billion in 2011, or nine percent of Afghanistan's GDP.

"If the profits of manufacturing and trafficking heroin are added to this figure, opium is a significant part of the Afghan economy and provides considerable funding to the insurgency and fuels corruption," the UN report pointed out.

It stated that about 78 percent of cultivation was concentrated in southern Afghanistan, where the United States has concentrated its troops to beat back militants' influence.

“This confirms the link between insecurity and opium cultivation observed since 2007," the report said.

The UNODC's representative in Afghanistan, Jean-Luc Lemahieu, said that on average the drugs trade made a $2 billion profit in Afghanistan between 2001 and 2010, turning into a $66 billion profit abroad.

“The total amount of hectares eradicated increased by 65 percent in 2011. However, the area eradicated represents only three percent of the total cultivation area," Lemahieu noted.

_________________

FAST AND FURIOUS: 22 shocking facts about the scandal that could bring down the Obummer administration





MENA

A peaceful second force.

.
.
.
.
World it not be wonderful if the two powers acted in unison to maintain world peace, in more theaters. The absence of a rival superpower has meant the USA has been allowed to run amok, causing harm to many nations........and indeed as the PNAC 2000 documents state is a dry run for eventual encirclement of Russia and China.

____________________________

Russia & China Prevented Third World War

By the Orientalreview.org and therearenosunglasses.com

The decision by Russia and China, two permanent UN Security Council members, to veto the draft resolution that would have laid the groundwork for sanctions against Syria is still sparking lively discussion. Damascus welcomed the decision by Moscow and Beijing to block the UN Security Council draft resolution, emphasizing that Russia and China had sided with the people against injustice. Western politicians, for their part, sharply criticized the common stand taken by Russia and China.

The harshest criticism came from representatives of the United States. Although France, Britain, Germany and Portugal had submitted the draft resolution that Russia and China formally rejected, the most severe comments came from US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. It looks like she is prepared to defend to the end the supposed benefits of the “Western project” for arranging how people live in Syria.

(Sarcasm)

During a visit to the Dominican Republic, she said the countries that decided to veto the resolution will have to explain their reasons to the Syrian people and all who struggle for freedom and human rights around the world. State Department spokesperson Victoria Nuland expressed the hope that the number of countries willing to tighten the noose around the Syrian regime would grow.

Strangling the Assad regime at any cost—a motive they do not even bother to hide—can have disastrous consequences both for the region and for the entire world. It is, in fact, a spark that could ignite a third world war.

Russia and China are preventing a big war in the Middle East for an obvious reason—if the coalition intervenes in Syrian affairs, that intervention will automatically stretch into a war between Syria and Israel. Nor would Iran remain on the sidelines; it would side with Syria. That would mean the beginning of an unpredictable and protracted military conflict.

A conflict in the Middle East, where the interests of many powers are intertwined and where there are threshold nuclear states, could escalate into a global confrontation. Those currently feeling dizzy from the success of the “Libyan scenario” need to understand that.

The draft resolution rejected by Russia and China was based on a philosophy of confrontation and did not take into account that the Middle East is a real powder keg. It was marked by a one-sided condemnatory bias against Damascus, but it did not address the Syrian opposition, which has also resorted to violence and has even started adopting terrorist methods. The Western states have actually taken matters in Syria to the point where a full-scale ethnic and religious conflict could erupt.

The Assad regime is evolving, but the West does not want to accept that. It is essentially insisting that he be removed by force. As the Chairman of the State Duma International Affairs Committee, Konstatin Kosachev, pointed out:

“There are a number of legislative initiatives for abandoning the one-party system, holding democratic elections and allowing the media more freedom. It would be unwise to deny the opportunity to move forward in an evolutionary, not a revolutionary, fashion. That would not be in the interests of the Syrian people. That is the significance of the stand Russia and China took in the Security Council. Artificial outside pressure on political processes in Syria can only provoke new bloodshed, new unrest and new tragedies.”

A Syrian collapse due to civil war would have a disruptive impact throughout the Middle East. Russia and China have offered the Security Council their own version of the document as an alternative. It stresses that Western military intervention in the conflict between the government and opposition in Syria is a non-starter.

Prof. Sergey Luzyanin – Deputy Director of the Russian Institute of the Far Eastern Studies.

Balkanizing Egypt.

.
.
.
.
The American trained Egyptian security apparatus helped the USA/Israel topple Mubarak, and now the Egyptian military are failing Egypt again, as further destabilization engulfs the country. It is possible the country could be Balkanized, and divided creating a Christian enclave near Alexandria, and NATO occupation of the Suez...........all this must be blamed on the American trained Egyptian military who also STILL take American military aid.

__________________________

EGYPT BEING BROKEN UP by aangirfan.

Cairo, October 2011.

On 10 October 2011, we learn that at least 24 people have been killed in Cairo.

At least three of the dead are said to be soldiers.

Christians, protesting about an attack on a church in Aswan in Upper Egypt, have clashed with military police.

Army vehicles have been set alight.

Agent provocateurs may be at work.

Reportedly, the CIA and its friends want the Christians in Egypt, 10% of the population, to form a separate state in Upper Egypt, a state that would help control the Nile.

Cairo, October 2011

"This is a dark day in the military's history. This is betrayal, a conspiracy, murder," Magdy el-Serafy wrote on Twitter. (Egypt cabinet to meet over violence that kills 24‎)

"What happened in front of the state TV building is exactly what happened on Jan. 25," wrote Muslim activist Asmaa Mahfouz.

"What happened today is unprecedented in Egypt. 17 corpses crushed by military tanks," Hossam Bahgat, human rights activist tweeted from hospital. "I saw bodies missing hands and legs, heads twisted away or plastered to the ground."

Protesters also took to the streets in Alexandria.

Iraq is the main victiom of 9/11, then Afghanistan, then the USA, then finally Pakistan.

.
.
.
.
A rather stale Western liberal overview of the plight of Pakistan. Pakistan is indeed a victim, but equally important it must be said that had not the Pakistani military (ISI) participated in Washington's games in the region for 30 odd years, and had they not been so gullible and naive, Pakistan would not be in the situation it is now.

The primary folly lies with the Pakistan military, and still to this day the Pakistani military clings to gora masterji in the cooperation with them in Afghanistan. The acrimony towards Pakistan now by gora sahib masterji is not because the Pakistani military has ceased reading from the Washington written script, but that there are always power dynamics which change policy in Washington, with competing groups which sometimes harms old faithful ally's. Diem in Vietnam for example....Saddam in Iraq...Gaddafi in Libya....General Noreiga in Panama.....all products of the USA.

The biggest obstacle for Pakistan is the Pakistan military working with the USA covertly.

As to who is the main victim of 9/11....well I would say Iraq obviously, given what has happened to that country between 2003--2011. Then Afghanistan still under occupation, then the USA as it slides into further decline with $trillions in war costs etc......and the fourth of course Pakistan with the loss of 35,000 civilian deaths, and economic loss according to Pakistan government statistics of $68 billion since 2001.

Pakistan with its 1,100,000 military machine, nuke weapons and substantial conventional forces is a not a "VICTIM" in any sense, bullied by Washington to accept Washington's terms or else (though threats have been used). After all Pakistan always had China to fall back on.

But it is in the current Failed State due entirely to the folly and stupidity of its military top brasses fascination for gora sahib. Civilian politicians NEVER had the ultimate power to really control and run the country, for better or worse, so they are absolved.

Zardari bhen is a puppet brought to power by the USA.......his job is simply grinning in front of the camera and looting the country........hence another explanation for the mess in the country.

_____________________

Pakistan is the Real Victim of Bush's Great 9/11 Folly

By Peter Preston in the Guardian.

We have seen 10 years of going nowhere on one side of the border – and 10 of going backwards on the other: back to bloodshed, back to civil chaos. It's simplistic to say that Afghanistan doesn't matter. You might as well say that the 100 years of war that scarred medieval Europe didn't matter. But Afghanistan still belongs to an inchoate, old world of milling conflict. Seize power there and turmoil will soon take it away. Leave enemies to stew. The real victim of Bush's great 9/11 folly is Pakistan. It might have been a buoyant nation today, joining India and China at world economic forums. Instead it is a failing state.

A decade ago General Musharraf was Pakistan's new man on top of the heap. He'd locked prime minister Nawaz Sharif away for life. As the army habitually seized Islamabad power, there was nothing too surprising here. Musharraf's battalions depended on US weapons and cash. Sharif's Muslim League, seeking friends elsewhere, had endangered all that. What would America do once the dust from the twin towers had cleared? Invade Afghanistan; throw out the Taliban. What could Musharraf do? Only swear to support them.

But it was never that easy, of course. The fatal border, the Durand Line, barely exists in any physical sense. Tribal areas straddle it. Rule of law barely exists, then as now. Two million or more Afghan refugees huddled in ramshackle camps on the road from the Khyber Pass to Peshawar. Pakistan (recruited by Washington as an ally against Soviet occupation in Kabul) couldn't stand idly by. It was involved in every way – just as India, across its other border, was involved in keeping Musharraf off balance. A political quagmire in the making.

So today, those 10 dreadful years on? Musharraf is in London exile. Benazir Bhutto, the supposed hope of democracy, is dead, murdered by zealots. Her husband, Asif Ali Zardari, is president. And just look at the public opinion polls.

A couple of years ago Gallup Pakistan asked people in the country what the most serious threat to Jinnah's pure state was. Some 11% said the Taliban, 18% India – but 59% picked the United States of America. Asked the same sort of question (via the Pew Research Centre) this summer, after Bin Laden was killed, and about 70% saw America as more enemy than saviour. Every drone attack runs the risk of making that opposition deeper. Who approves of Zardari's leadership? It lurches along in the 10% range, come rain or more rain. Who wants the army back? Only 8% in 2009, and its commander-in-chief's ratings are slipping. The leader-in-waiting is Sharif, probably in political business again, but this is back to the future with a vengeance.

There is, in short, no consensus of any meaningful kind – except, perhaps, blind antipathy towards Washington. There are no trusted institutions, no leaders who command respect, no prospect beyond the irredeemably bleak. And it is against this background that America blames Pakistan for its frailty in the fight against terrorism and cuts back on military aid. Pakistan in US eyes is an enemy, not an ally. Pakistan must be lectured and punished. But Pakistan is also a victim of western policy. So many stumbles, so many wrong turnings: but a victim nonetheless.

Its sense of grievance may be unappealing. The preoccupation with India, the futile attachment to Kashmir, the hapless swings between corrupt democracy and army autocracy are all heavy burdens. Yet the message of public opinion, in its bewilderment, cannot be ignored. For three decades of Afghan tumult, Pakistan has been blown hither and yon by outside imbecilities. And 10 full years after 9/11, it is the heaviest casualty of them all.

Doenme Turkey must not become another slave of Washington

.
.
.
.
Turkey is a strange mixture of Latin people to the West, and Iranian people to the East, and a minority of ethnic Turks in the center constituting less than 8% of the population, and Celtic people (Galata) constituting 5% again in the center of the country.

Ataturk the secret Doenme Jew, created the modern secular State of Turkey in 1923, and saved it from Western backed Balkanization plans led by the British after their defeat in the Great War.

Ottoman Turkey's decline had been accelerated by the Secret Jewish Doenme Young Turk movement funded by the Rothschilds of London from about 1900, and specifically when they came to power in 1913; 25% of Ethnic Turks died in the Great War, created division within the multi-cultural empire with the false Pan-Turanism, and they killed the economically and socially dominant 1.5 million Armenians, using the Ottoman army so that the Jews/Doenme could become the dominant economic group within the country (Ditto Soviet Union then and now).

However it must also be said Ottoman Turkey as a power had been slowly declining from about 1650 onwards, and that this was not due to the Doenme secret Jews within the Ottoman Empire.

Turkey since 1950 has been a member of NATO, and has sought EU membership even though the Europeans don't want them in the Jewish run club, CLEARLY.......though this does not seem to discourage the Turkish State. It plays in the European soccer leagues, and participates in the European song contest.

Turkey also participates in the USA occupation of Afghanistan harvesting the Afghan Opium/Heroin with M.I.T transporting the drugs to Turkey, then Kosovo and finally into Europe.

In my journeys through Turkey and Istanbul, a lot of the cliche Jewish games were obediently and methodically played to please their Jewish masters, by MIT and the Istanbul Police.........mixed with Jewish Chutzpah Parody. Even to the extent of contradicting the essence of what Turkey is.

In the current situation it is not in Turkey's long term interests to endorse the CIA/Western backed destabilization of Tunisia, Egypt, Libya, Syria, Yemen and so forth, because:

1. Today it is Tunisia, Egypt, Libya and Syria........tomorrow it can be Turkey, with the gradual slow weakening of its secular position.

2. NO games from the West involving destabilization, using special forces and "People Power" should be legitimated for moral, economic, political and security reasons. Especially a country from that region.

3. If "al-CIA-duh" comes to power with Western covert backing then the target State is obviously de-legitimatized.......which means it will militarily be targeted in the future as per Taliban Afghanistan, and Mullah Iran. This is the Jewish game since the 1970's, with Israel creating Hamas.

4. To be sure it feels good to belong to a "Secret Boys Club" where one is the "INSIDER" with briefings of top secret information, and perceptions of strategic gain (Pakistan/Afghanistan/Taliban/"strategic depth"......total disaster for Pakistan....now "given" to India by the USA)......but this is a temporary high of Pabulum, something the Pakistani military well know.

5. Turkey 90% is in Asia, and it is in Turkey's strategic interests to get along with her Asian neighbors first, and not conspire against the very same for the sake of the International Jew, far away based in NY, London and other such places. To do otherwise would be donkey Doenme stupid.......greater trade between Turkey and her neighbors, greater security cooperation, rather than carry out security ops for NATO, a defunct organization originally set up to fight the Soviet Union, and now struggling to find meaning and justification for its existence, and as muscle for the harvesting of opium in Afghanistan in essence.

It is not wise thus for Turkey to base any NATO missiles and radar which are directed against Iran, or support the destabilization of Syria.

It is foolish for Sultan Erdogan I to visit Egypt, Tunisia and Libya JUST AFTER Cameron and Sarkozy had visited the region, endorsing the rise of "al-CIA-duh" in the region.

Endorsing Turkeys model of secular Islamic governments is however a good thing in such regions.........BUT the overall context within which it is promoted timing wise is wholly wrong.




______________________________

Iran tells Turkey: change tack or face trouble

By Robin Pomeroy of Reuters, Yahoo News, and antiwar.com

A key aide to Iran's supreme leader said on Saturday Turkey must radically rethink its policies on Syria, the NATO missile shield and promoting Muslim secularism in the Arab world -- or face trouble from its own people and neighbors.

In an interview with the semi-official Mehr news agency, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei's military adviser described Prime Minister Tayyip Erdogan's invitation to Arab countries to adopt Turkish-style democracy as "unexpected and unimaginable."

Turkey and Iran, the Middle East's two major non-Arab Muslim states, are vying for influence in the Arab world as it goes through the biggest shake-up since the Ottoman Empire fell, a rivalry that has strained their previously close relations.

While cheering crowds greeted Erdogan on his recent tour of North Africa, Tehran accused him of serving U.S. interests by opposing Syrian President Bashar al-Assad's crackdown on street protests and agreeing to NATO's missile defense.

"The behavior of Turkish statesmen toward Syria and Iran is wrong and, I believe, they are acting in line with the goals of America," Major-General Yahya Rahim-Safavi told Mehr.

"If Turkey does not distance itself from this unconventional political behavior it will have both the Turkish people turning away from it domestically and the neighboring countries of Syria, Iraq and Iran (reassessing) their political ties."

Khamenei has dubbed the Arab uprisings an "Islamic awakening," predicting peoples in the Middle East that have overthrown dictatorial, Western-backed regimes will follow the path Iran took after its 1979 Islamic revolution.

The uprisings have been generally secular in nature, analysts say.

Erdogan's advocacy of secular Muslim democracy -- which he extolled during his tour of Egypt, Tunisia and Libya last month -- is far from the message the Islamic Republic of Iran wants spread in the region.

"I think the Turks are treading a wrong path. It might very well be that the path was set for them by the Americans," said Rahim-Safavi.

"The Turks have so far committed a few strategic wrongs. One was Erdogan's trip to Egypt and his presentation of the secular model there. This fact was unexpected and unimaginable since the Egyptian people are Muslims."

While Tehran has publicly urged its close ally Syria to listen to people's legitimate demands, Erdogan has predicted Assad will be ousted "sooner or later" and is set to impose sanctions on Damascus despite a veto on U.N. action by Russia and China.

But it is Turkey's decision to deploy a NATO missile early warning system that has most angered Tehran, which sees this as a U.S. ploy to protect Israel from any counter-attack should the Jewish state target Iran's nuclear facilities.

Rahim-Safavi said trade ties with Turkey -- which is an importer of Iranian gas and exporter of an array of manufactured goods -- would be in jeopardy if Ankara does not change tack.

"If Turkish political leaders fail to make their foreign policy and ties with Iran clear, they will run into problems. If, as they claim, they intend to raise the volume of contracts with Iran to the $20 billion mark, they will ultimately have to accommodate Iran."

(Additional reporting by Mitra Amiri and Hashem Kalantari; Editing by Mark Heinrich)

Sick Uncle Tom Clown makes an Orwellian speech

.
.
.
.

Ten years in Afghanistan means its the longest "war" the USA has ever fought, based on ignoble causes, which at least a third of the USA servicemen are aware of.

Ten years in Afghanistan means the bankers have made fat profits from the Afghan heroin/opium trade.

Ten years in Afghanistan means the further criminalization of the USA, as it conducts wars for criminal narcotics purposes, where State institutions become corrupted and compromised for this specific sole purpose. It subverts the state into thinking that this is the ONLY way the USA can generate wealth, and create things....which benefits a few Wall Street Jews, but harms millions in the USA, Europe, Russia, Ukraine, Central Asia, Iran, Afghanistan, Pakistan.

Ten years in Afghanistan means that due to the criminality and double standards of the USA occupation of the country......distorting double rectum-speak becomes the norm of the State.

Ten years in Afghanistan means that many occupation servicemen have lost their lives for a worthless artificial Western Intelligence concocted lie.

Ten years in Afghanistan means that many occupation servicemen have suffered serious injury for a worthless artificial Western Intelligence concocted lie.

Ten years in Afghanistan means the USA has expended anywhere between $600--1000 billion in Afghanistan for a fake security cause, concocted by Western Intelligence.

Ten years in Afghanistan means the "Opportunity Cost" loss of the above money that could have been invested in the USA to make the country shining and successful, and not a basket case debt ridden country beholden to China, along with the real shame that goes with it.

Ten years in Afghanistan means thousands of innocent Afghan civilians have died, and the subsequent loss of dignity, opportunity and development that ordinary Afghans could have enjoyed but for the faggotty games of Western Intelligence.

Ten years in Afghanistan means that the country has seen little development under American occupation, little stability and is considered among the most corrupted, Failed States in the world, run by a Kleptocracy of American elected puppets running an American sanctioned narco State.

Ten years in Afghanistan means its security problem for Pakistan, and to a lessor extent Iran.

Ten years in Afghanistan means the Heroin grown by the American occupation forces in Afghanistan is exported to Pakistan, Central Asia, Iran, Ukraine, Russia, EU and North America.........causing suffering for millions of people around the world.

Ten years in Afghanistan means the laws introduced to make America safer have in reality been inverted against average Americans into humiliation, degradation, servitude and loss of basic liberty within a Police State.

Ten years in Afghanistan means that the military/industrial complex has profited hugely, but that the middle class in the USA has been disappearing, and the working class squeezed.

Ten years in Afghanistan means the USA military machine is less able to fight REAL foes in REAL wars, but can only manage fights against Western Intelligence organized "Controlled Opposition" entities such as the Taliban.

No nation "wins' from wars, be they a few days or 10 years.
































_________________________

Obama Marks Decade in Afghanistan With False Statements on Wars

Obama claimed America has been made safer and that the wars are drawing to an end, despite facts to the contrary

by John Glaser, at antiwar.com

President Barak Obama marked the ten-year anniversary of the war in Afghanistan with a paper statement, claiming to already have made a public speech reflecting the decade of war last month, on the anniversary of September 11th.

The statement contained the usual platitudes of patriotism and glorification of war. ”Thanks to the extraordinary service of these Americans, our citizens are safer and our nation is more secure,” Obama said.

Obama made these statements, of course, while ignoring the mountains of evidence that these ten years of war, and in Afghanistan specifically, have exacerbated the terrorist threat America faces. War, occupation, Afghanistan’s corrupt client state, thuggish US-supported militias and a brutal night raid strategy have all increased anti-American hatred and resentment among a poor, uneducated, overly religious population.

Obama also misled Americans in his statement by pretending that American troops were withdrawing in Iraq and drawing down in Afghanistan. In Iraq, an expanded diplomatic presence and military presence will remain past the December deadline for withdrawal. US presence, and heavy influence over the Iraqi regime in general will not go away any time soon.

In Afghanistan, the transition to Afghan-controlled security has gone terribly wrong and the presence of “trainers” has been increasing. Meanwhile, top military officials have repeatedly explained that a heavy US military presence will remain in Afghanistan well beyond the 2014 date to withdraw.

Waiting for Secret Jew Ahmedinejad to visit "al-CIA-duh" liberated Libya.

.
.
.
.
We hear great speeches from Secret Jew Ahmedinejad, and the Mullah donkeys (That is all they are good for) what a great "Islamic Awakening" is taking place in the MENA, because of "People Power" and the "Arab Spring" in Tunisia, Egypt, Libya, Syria, Yemen and so forth.............English phrases concocted by Western Intelligence.

So naturally Secret Jew Ahmedinejad and his sugar daddy who brought him to power in 2005, Ayatollah Seyed Ali Hoseyni Khāmene’i, should also visit such countries to reaffirm their support of the Western Intelligence backed destabilization programs in Tunisia, Egypt, Libya, Syria, Yemen and so forth.........based on their speeches in Iran.....Yes?

After all Doenme Turkey, and its leaders have fully backed the rebels in Tunisia, Egypt, Libya, and Syria........and Sultan Erdogan I has even conducted state visits to such countries, shaking hands and sharing the podium with the "al-CIA-duh" terrorists in Libya by way of one exemplary instance. Provided them with money, arms, fuel to the rebels since February......NATO logistics, and saber rattling on the Syrian border, and hosting the Syrian rebel leadership in Istanbul......and any other orders from Washington DC. All such noble deeds just after Cameron and Sarkozy visited and endorsed the carpet bombing of Libya, ousting its popular leader Gaddafi (A confirmed Socialist) in favor of "al-CIA-duh" terrorists....whom Gaddafi had fought for many years in the East of his country.

Of course secret Jew Ahmedinejad, and his sugar daddy Ayatollah Seyed Ali Hoseyni Khāmene’i cannot go to Libya, and declare their support for the rebels for a variety of reasons, unlike Erdogan, Sarkozy and Cameron.

1. There is no indication the hardline Sunni "al-CIA-duh" affiliated rebels in Libya want them to come.

2. If they endorse such rebels in Libya, then it encourages the "wrong crowd" in Iran itself, in a country where quite a few people are not really happy with the mullahs.

3. Secret Jew Ahmedinejad, and his sugar daddy Ayatollah Seyed Ali Hoseyni Khāmene’i cannot go to Libya, because it raises the awkward question that if the USA backed "al-CIA-duh" affiliated rebels into power in Libya, and are in the process of doing so in Egypt, Tunisia, Syria, Yemen, Somalia and other ME countries......then logically is not just possible the USA and their international poodles also destabilized the Shah and installed the mullahs into power.....32 years ago?

4. Sharing the podium in occupied, carpet bombed, subdued Tripoli, glad handing "al-CIA-duh" affiliated rebels might be very undesirable.

In the case of Syria things are delicate but also very clear. Assad of Syria is an ally of Iran, and his father was also an ally, remaining steadfast on the side of Iran during the Iran/Iraq war, providing arms and many other things, as a vital conduit to Lebanon. An 'al-CIA'duh" affiliated rebel government in Damascus will not be so friendly with Tehran, just as the CIA backed Taliban never was.

Publicly, diplomatically Iran can remain stand offish...."What is happening in Syria is an internal matter, we have no comment; we hope the problems of Syria can be settled peacefully......blah b;ah blah" ....privately Tehran MUST provide logistical, financial, and even Revolutionary Guard support to the regime (the latter not being too obvious). Syrian oil can also in addition be sold by Tehran, without taking any handling commission.

Assad must not fall, Syria must not fall to "al-CIA'duh". Syria should be advised to eject all Western tourists, and the closure of certain Western embassies, and their operations in Syria such as Western NGO's, consulates, businesses etc.

This will make it easier to manage Syria.

Exports are not everything

.
.
.
.
It is good that the Iranian economy/trade is less reliant on oil/gas exports. If the puppet mullah statistics are to be believed, Iran will achieve non-oil exports of $45 billion for the financial year of March 21st, 2011 ---March 20th, 2012. It was $32 billion 2010-2011, and will reach $60 billion 2012--2013.

This a modest success in comparison to Turkeys non-oil projected exports of $160 billion for 2012--2013 and China's $1,900 billion.

But exports is not everything, but what is the overall performance of the economy.

It would be useful if the puppet mullah donkeys could achieve 10% real annual GDP growth fully justified given the current boost in oil prices and boom in non-oil exports. It is simply ridiculous to have $150 billion exports and a MERE $60 billion imports projected for 2011--2012.

We understand the puppet mullahs are stealing from the state funds rather than allow greater imports which would boost the economy significantly....INVESTMENT AND CONSUMPTION (petrol exports would pay for these imports.) It is also a shame that the mullahs have driven out 5,000,000 million middle class Iranians with their $1500 billion assets.

But this all to be expected from such a regime.
_______________________________

Iran non-oil exports to hit $60bn by 2013

Presstv.com

Iran's President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad says his administration is planning to increase the country's non-oil exports to 60 billion dollars by March 2013.

In a televised interview with state television late on Tuesday, the Iranian chief executive said that Iran's non-oil exports have reached about USD 20.5 billion in the first half of the current Persian calendar year (started March 21), IRNA reported.

The president stated that the value of Iran's exports will surpass USD 45 billion by the end of this year.

Ahmadinejad also pointed to an improvement in Iran's economic conditions despite the sanctions imposed on Tehran over its civilian nuclear program and the current economic crisis facing the world.

Meanwhile, Director of Iran's Customs Administration Abbas Me'marnejad said on Sunday that Iran's non-oil exports in the first six months of the current year have increased by nearly 40 percent.

China was the main importer of Iranian goods and the United Arab Emirate, Iraq, India and Afghanistan were the other major destinations for Iran's exports over this period, Me'marnejad added.

Iran also witnessed a 20.5-percent drop in its imports, with the value of the country's imports falling to USD 29.5 billion, the official added.

Me'marnejad said steel, corn for livestock and rice were the country's major imports.

According to Me'marnejad, the United Arab Emirate, China, South Korea, Germany and Turkey are the major exporters to Iran.

Mullah Iran does not understand the meaning of mass production.

.
.
.
.
Iran has less than 350 jet fighters dating mostly from the 1960's and 1970's. They are outdated 2nd and 3rd generation fighters, in an era that is focused on 5th generation fighters NOW.

The Syrian airforce in fact has more jet fighters, as does Pakistan, Turkey, Egypt compared to mullah Iran. Israel has over 1000, and the USA over 5000, with another 5000 in storage.

We do not understand why the puppet Mullahs, installed by the USA/UK have not made greater efforts in 32 years of their donkey like rule, to produce domestically produced jet fighters. Especially after 1991, when air-power was used to destroy the forces of CIA-Saddam, and again in 2003, and in Afghanistan to defeat the CIA-Taliban 2001, and more recently in Libya against CIA-Gaddafi.

The donkey puppet mullahs keep making counter-threats to the aggression from the USA/Israel, specifically that if Iran is attacked there will be a terrible response to any attacks against Iran............fair enough, but with what?

Even the process of building a 4th generation fighter, with a fully functioning assembly plant, supported by 500 other factories which make the approximately 4000 parts of the jet plane will take many years to realize, and then having to find and train the technical personnel to work in such factories and assembly plant.

This will be hard given that mullah Iran has deliberately encouraged the mass emigration of about 5,000,000 mostly middle class technical orientated Iranians.....to the West. Some maybe even working in Western defense firms.

For puppet mullah Iran to realize its dream of being a modern technically advanced country, which is also prosperous, it must get rid of its "Arab Wahabi" pretensions, and adopt a more favorable, civilized Persian posture toward the Iranian middle class. The illiterate farmers son joining the Baseeji, on motorbikes and knives has very limited use except in keeping the regime in power, and threatening the middle class led organized opposition. Just maybe some of the $1500 billion taken out of the country will be brought back, and re-invested in Iran, if the mullah follows the right policies.

Iran does not make its own planes, and certainly does not mass produce them, therefore the article below is an out right lie.

What Iran has done is taken parts from existing F-5 Tigershark planes brought from the USA in the 1960's, added two rear fins and produced less than a dozen of them....and thats it, mass production Iranian style. Their new Saeqeh and Azarakhsh jet fighters.

We hope Persia one day can mass produce its exclusively own jet fighter that has not been copied from the USA. This will be a great achievement since the flight of the world's first jet fighter in 1938.

Of immediate requirement for Iran's defense is of course a huge AA force with 30--40,000 such guns, which are easier to make under license, or brought from China and Russia, or even leased from such countries over a few years to fill a gap in the weakness of the air defense system equipped with just 1800 LAA as of now.

In addition about 3000 SAMs batteries as ditto with the AA above.

Iran can work with Pakistan, and also learn from the country in such matters. Pakistan license produces a Chinese Jet fighter, and has been given the luxury of calling it its own domestically produced one (they in reality assemble the parts from China.......Pakistan's industrial base is smaller than Iran's, and certainly does not have the capacity to produce 4000 parts required for a modern jet fighter).

Saeqeh and Azarakhsh fighter jets have no military value since they represent fighters jets from the 1960's of USA origin. Vital resources must not be wasted copying old outdated planes from the USA. It is better copying Russian or Chinese jet fighters. Politically this is also important.


Worthless Jet fighter that should be used as a trainer, which was the original intention of the USA manufacturers in the 1950's, when it was on the drawing board.....and IS used as a trainer still around the world.
________________________________

Iran to develop new fighter jet

Presstv.com

Iran's Defense Minister Brigadier General Ahmad Vahidi says the country has launched a new project, intended to design and build a new advanced fighter jet.

Brigadier General Vahidi said on Thursday that Iran has gained considerable experience through the design and mass production of its first home-made Saeqeh (Thunderbolt) and Azarakhsh (Lightening) fighter jets, IRNA reported.

He made the remarks in Nojeh air base in the city of Hamedan, located 400 kilometers (248 miles) southwest of the Iranian capital Tehran.

The Iranian defense minister noted that the design and production of advanced home-made fighter jets reveal the competence of Iran's defense industries and prove the futility of the US-led UN sanctions and additional unilateral sanctions imposed on the Islamic Republic by the US and its European allies.

Brigadier General Mohammadreza Karshki said last February that the Islamic Republic of Iran Air Force has begun an extensive project to design and build the country's most advanced fighter jet.

He added that the Iranian Air Force is cooperating with the nation's Defense Ministry in the project.

The Iranian fighter jet is similar to the US-built F/A-18, although its appearance looks similar to F-5E/F Tiger II.

(I wonder why???????? Can we guess??? If it quacks like a duck, then it must be a duck surely))

The new single-seat bomber has the ability to track down enemy aircraft, engage in combat, target locations on the ground, and carry a load of assorted weapons and ammunition.

Iran unveiled its first squadron of Saeqeh fighter-bombers in an air show in September 2010.